Amit Bhartia urges rethink on India equity premium
Delorean Partners' Amit Bhartia says investors should reassess India's market premium as growth, returns and valuations enter a new regime.
India can look expensive on a spreadsheet and still be cheap for the wrong reason. That is the uncomfortable message investors are being asked to sit with.
Amit Bhartia, founder of Delorean Partners, has argued that Indian equities need a fresh valuation lens. His point is simple. Do not ask only whether India trades cheaper than its past. Ask whether today’s economy deserves yesterday’s premium.
That matters for anyone with SIPs, mutual funds, or a growing stock portfolio. If the market multiple changes, even good companies can give dull returns.
India’s old premium needs testing
For years, investors accepted that India deserved a higher valuation than many other markets. The reason sounded fair. India had faster growth, cleaner corporate balance sheets, and a long domestic demand story.
The usual yardstick is the price-to-earnings ratio, or P/E. It shows how much investors pay for each rupee of company profit. A higher P/E means the market expects stronger future growth.
Bhartia said many investors now feel reassured because India’s P/E premium over the United States and emerging markets has fallen below old averages. On paper, that makes India look less stretched.
But averages can fool you. A ₹5 lakh portfolio falling 10 percent means a ₹50,000 hit. The average over ten years will not pay next month’s EMI.
His argument is that valuation depends on the regime. In plain English, the market’s “fair price” changes when earnings, politics, and household finances change.
Earnings edge has softened
The first pressure point is earnings. India’s premium was built on the belief that Indian companies would grow profits faster than peers.
Bhartia pointed to 12-month trailing earnings per share data, rebased from March 2012. This means every market starts at the same number, so investors can compare growth fairly.
According to him, India led emerging markets until September 2025. After that, it lost that lead. The comparison with the US also moved in the same weak direction.
That is not a small detail. Stock prices can run ahead for some time, but profits must eventually catch up. If profits slow, high valuations become harder to defend.
For retail investors, this means the headline index level is not enough. The Bombay Stock Exchange’s Sensex and the National Stock Exchange’s Nifty 50 can look stable, while earnings quality quietly weakens.
A market can also become expensive without rising much. If profits fall and prices stay flat, the P/E still climbs. That is the bit many investors miss during calm trading days.
Geopolitics is less comfortable
The second change sits outside Dalal Street. Bhartia argued that India benefited for years from Washington’s focus on China.
That gave India strategic room. The US saw India as a useful counterweight in Asia. Trade, technology, and talent flows expanded under that broad umbrella.
But Bhartia said the relationship is entering a more demanding phase. India’s trade surplus, technology exports, and student presence in the US have grown sharply.
He cited US Deputy Secretary of State Christopher Landau’s remarks at the Raisina Dialogue. Landau said America would not repeat with India what it sees as earlier mistakes with China.
That comment matters because it changes the tone. India may still remain important to Washington, but importance does not mean free passage.
Bhartia also referred to Russia analyst Alexander Gabuev’s view that Russia has become more dependent on China. That reduces India’s old balancing room.
For Indian companies, geopolitics is not abstract. It affects visa rules, export controls, outsourcing contracts, defence ties, and supply chains. These eventually touch earnings.
Household stress cannot be ignored
The third warning comes from the ground. Bhartia used a “Grassroots Distress Index” to track household pressure.
The index combines three signals. It looks at real entry-level IT salaries, microfinance loan stress, and household net financial savings as a share of GDP.
Each one tells a story. Weak starting salaries hurt young workers. Microfinance stress points to repayment trouble among low-income borrowers. Low financial savings mean families have less cushion.
Bhartia said this index is at a multi-year high. That suggests pressure on households may be stronger than official growth numbers reveal.
This is where markets often become too polished for their own good. A Nifty chart can look neat. A family budget usually tells the rougher truth.
If young professionals earn less after inflation, they spend less. If small borrowers fall behind, lenders tighten. If households save less, mutual fund flows may also face pressure later.
India’s domestic demand story remains powerful. But it cannot run forever on stretched wallets and optimistic projections.
What investors should watch
Bhartia’s argument does not say Indian equities are doomed. It says investors should stop treating the past as a ready-made answer.
The better question is what multiple India deserves now. If earnings regain strength, households recover, and geopolitics stays manageable, the premium can hold.
If those three pillars weaken together, the market may need a lower fair value. That does not always mean a crash. Sometimes it means years of flat returns.
This is the part long-term investors should take seriously. A market can move sideways while companies keep reporting mixed numbers. Your SIP continues, but wealth builds slowly.
The consensus often loves clean stories. India as a structural growth market is one such story. It is broadly true, but not complete.
Investors should track profit growth, not only index milestones. They should watch wage trends, loan stress, and household savings. They should also watch US policy toward Indian technology and trade.
For ordinary readers, the message is practical. Do not panic because one investor questions valuations. But do not buy blindly because India is cheaper than its own history. In markets, like in life, the right price depends on the weather outside, not just the memory of sunnier days.